SAIs
Relation with stakeholders
|
Title |
Questionnaire on the concept and stakeholders of the SAI’s social utilisation and transparency of public sector audits |
|
Year |
2018 |
|
Subject |
First questionnaire of the EUROSAI Project Group on social utilisation and transparency of public sector audits |
|
Description |
The Survey aims to specify the concept and stakeholders of the SAI’s social utilisation and transparency of public sector audits |
|
Source |
EUROSAI Project Group on social utilisation and transparency of public sector audits |
|
Survey |
|
|
Survey’s Results |
|
|
Comments |
|
|
Contacts |
|
Title |
Legal instruments of SAI’s impact on the activities of the auditees |
|
Year |
2015 |
|
Subject |
SAIs Mandate SAIs Relations with Stakeholders |
|
Description |
Survey aimed at identifying any legal instruments and procedures (other than judiciary) through which SAIs can influence auditees’ activities |
|
Source |
SAI of Poland |
|
Survey |
|
|
Survey’s Results |
Legal instruments of SAI's impact on the activities of the auditees - Results |
|
Comments |
23 European SAIs replied to the survey |
|
Contacts |
|
Title |
Supreme Audit Institutions and Stakeholder Engagement Practices |
|
Year |
2014 |
|
Subject |
SAIs Relations with Stakeholders |
|
Description |
This stocktaking report provides SAIs, policy makers and other public management practitioners with a clear and comprehensive synthesis and analysis of progress to date in the approaches SAIs use to engage with citizens and other external stakeholders. It aims to help understand SAI engagement, and to take a first step to identifying engagement approaches and instruments and in evaluating their results. |
|
Source |
Effective Institutions Platform (EIP) |
|
Survey |
|
|
Survey’s Results |
Supreme Audit Institutions and Stakeholder Engagement Practices - Report |
|
Comments |
The report is based on the analysis of 32 SAIs. The sample cuts across different regions and income levels and covers a wide range of political/legal contexts as well as a diverse range of engagement instruments and tools. Fifteen cases are from OECD countries and 17 from non OECD countries. Nine cases are from Latin America and the Caribbean, eight from Europe, four from Africa, three the Middle East and North Africa, three from Asia, three from the Pacific, and two from North America. |
|
Contacts |
Joint OECD-UNDP secretariat |
|
Title |
De lege ferenda motions |
|
Year |
2013 |
|
Subject |
SAIs Mandate SAIs Relations with Stakeholders |
|
Description |
Survey to obtain information on SAIs’ practices of putting forward proposals for legislative improvements, so-called de lege ferenda motions, to introduce amendments to the law in force or to propose new regulations |
|
Source |
SAI of Poland |
|
Survey |
|
|
Survey’s Results |
Questionnaire on de lege ferenda motions - Results |
|
Comments |
21 European SAIs replied to the survey |
|
Contacts |
Chair:
Member:
Postal address:
Telephone:
Email:
Web address: